• Skip to Content
  • Skip to Main Navigation
  • Skip to Section Navigation
ash scotland - Action on Smoking and Health
 

Contact Us | Site Map


Main Navigation: 
  • Home
  • Media
  • Policy
  • Information
  • Projects
  • Alliances
  • Training
  • Quit smoking

  • Bulletins
  • Tobacco control legislation in Scotland
  • National evaluation of Scotland's smoke-free legislation
  • Smoking rates in Scotland
  • Information briefings
  • Latest research
  • Key topics
  • Statistics
  • Useful links
  • Resources
  • Open days

Smoking Policies in Public Places - Survey of Public House and Restaurant Customers

Beliefs on Rights

Introduction

One of the main issues for exploration in the survey was the perception of rights: the right to smoke and the right not to be affected by the smoke of others. Respondents were therefore asked whether they felt smokers had the right to smoke in public houses and restaurants and whether non-smokers had the right to smoke free areas (see Table 4.1 and Table 4.2).

The Rights of Smokers
The majority of smokers thought they had the right to smoke in restaurants and public houses, particularly public houses. Nearly two thirds of non-smokers also felt smokers had the right to smoke in public houses but only a minority of non-smokers thought that smokers should have the right to smoke in restaurants. Urban respondents were more likely to support the rights of smokers than urban ones.

Table 4-1 The Rights of Smokers
People Have the Right to Smoke in... Smokers % Non-smokers %
Yes % No % Don't Know % Yes % No % Don't Know %
Public Houses 94 2 4 63 30 7
Restaurants 70 22 9 37 59 4
Public Houses
Urban 96 2 3 72 22 6
Rural 92 3 4 57 35 8
Restaurants
Urban 78 20 2 47 50 3
Rural 62 24 15 29 66 5

The Rights of Non-Smokers

The majority of non-smokers felt they had the right to smoke free areas, particularly in restaurants. Nearly two thirds of smokers felt that non-smokers had the right to smoke free areas in public houses and 82% thought that this should be the case in restaurants. Urban smokers and non-smokers were more concerned about the right of non-smokers to smoke free areas in public houses and restaurants than rural smokers and non-smokers. Urban respondents were also more likely to support the rights of smokers.

Table 4-2 The Rights of Non-Smokers
Non-smokers Have the Right to Smoke Free Areas in... Smokers % Non-smokers %
Yes % No % Don't Know % Yes % No % Don't Know %
Public Houses 65 28 7 83 12 5
Restaurants 82 11 6 94 3 3
Public Houses
Urban 72 22 6 93 5 2
Rural 58 34 8 75 17 8
Restaurants
Urban 85 11 5 96 2 2
Rural 80 12 8 92 4 4

Overall, these findings suggest a general preparedness to respect the rights of others, whether smokers or non-smokers. However, there appeared to be some emphasis on the rights of non-smokers in restaurants and of smokers in public houses. This could imply that, where smoking restrictions are already partly in place, such as in restaurants compared with public houses, they are accepted by both smokers and non-smokers.


Executive Summary
Introduction
Public House and Restaurant Use
Health Risks
Beliefs on Rights
Perceptions of Smoking Policies and Restrictions
Voluntary Charter and Code of Practice
Advantages and Disadvantages of a Smoke-Free Environment
Conclusions and Implications for Strategy

  • Back to top
  • Print this page
  • Content Disclaimer
  • Accessibility
  • Low Graphics
  • © ASH Scotland 2010

Action on Smoking & Health (Scotland) (ASH Scotland) is a registered Scottish charity (SC 010412) and a
company limited by guarantee(Scottish company no 141711). The registered office is 8 Frederick Street,
Edinburgh EH2 2HB.

ASH Scotland acknowledges with thanks the support of the British Heart Foundation and the Scottish Government in developing our website.

  • British Heart Foundation
  • Scottish Government